|
Mladen
Stilinovic, Izvadeni iz gomile, 1979
Removed From The Crowd: The Fate Of
Outer Planets
Bits and pieces from the
art of the 1960s and 1970s in SR
Croatia. In the mix.
December 23, 2009 -
January 15, 2010
You are kindly invited to
attend the opening of the exhibition on
Wednesday, December 23 at 7 pm
at Galerija Škuc.
Concept:
Ivana Bago and Antonia
Majača (Institute for Duration,
Location and Variables – DeLVe)
Research associate: Ana
Kovacic
A guided tour
and the
discussion with the
curators Ivana Bago and Antonia Majača.
Friday, January 15 at 6 pm at
Galerija Škuc.
Removed from the Crowd:
The Fate of Outer Planets
is a
curatorial/art-historical piece based on
ongoing research that considers the
phenomenon of the New Artistic Practice
in the SR Croatia during the 1960s and
1970s outside the context of the
analysis of the actual artistic
production of that time, involving new
elements and fragments with each new
presentation. The first phase of the
project was the educational program of
seminars with the students of art
history we initiated in Spring 2008
focusing on the history of curatorial
and exhibition practices. The first
‘staging’ of the project, presented
earlier this year in Belgrade in the
framework of the exhibition Political
Practices of (Post) Yugoslav Art focused
on the modes of collaborative work of
artists and the forms of self-organisation
while the second presentation, at Škuc
Gallery, includes a new chapter focusing
on progressive curatorial strategies and
innovative exhibition models.
Fragment 1: New
Collective Practices - Artists’
Association Beyond Manifesto and Program
stems from a consideration of the
three-year activity of the Podroom
Working Community of Artists.
Podroom, an artists-led space
initiated by Sanja Ivekovic and Dalibor
Martinis, was a working and exhibition
space that between 1978 and 1981 brought
together the key figures of the New
Artistic Practice. A transcript of a
conversation (a working meeting) held in
Podroom and published in the
“catalogue-journal” First Issue
(1980), which is a summary of the work
to date as well as an attempt to sketch
out a continuation of the activities of
this “community”, serves as a point of
departure for the rendering of narrative
about self-organised artistic
initiatives and the history of
associations from Gorgona Group at the
beginning of the 1960s to the
establishment of the artist –run PM
Gallery in Zagreb in 1981. What is
common to all the initiatives,
irrespective of their duration, is the
specific, non-programmatic and
organic manner in which they group
together around an only adumbrated
common goal. The fragment focuses on
temporary manifestations of
collectiveness, on models of “being
singular plural” or more exactly, on
being-with as a search for a
different understanding of the
relation between individual and
collective, but also for the point
of a collective itself and the
possibility of a joint programme.
It is precisely in this kind of
observation that the transgressivity of
working according to the given case or
‘by accident’ is brought out, as well as
of acting as a “negative of action”,
acting in invisibility, and ultimately -
the subversion of the manner in which
the dominant ideology at the time was
defining the concept of action,
collectivity and programme.
Fragment 2: New
Curatorial and Exhibition Practices
brings the focus to innovative
curatorial and institutional practices
with the special attention given to the
projects initiated and curated by Ida
Biard in Zagreb and Paris. The key
contribution of curators of the time as
well as of the institutions has usually
been taken for granted and has rarely
been the subject of research in the
local art historical narratives.
Selected curatorial projects, as well as
institutions and informal spaces in
which they took place, are here not seen
merely in the role of mediators who
present artistic products to the
audience, but as the active
protagonists and initiators of
innovative approaches to contemporary
art, whether these concern the New
Tendencies movement, early conceptual
art of the 60s or the New Artistic
Practice of the 70s. Moreover, their
role is seen as crucial in systematic
documentation and timely historization
of the innovative artistic practices,
enabling them to become relevant point
of reference in local art histories and
contemporary art and curatorial
practice. This emphasis on historization
and evaluation of exhibition and
curatorial practices represents an
initial contribution and a gesture that
opens up the discussion and prompts
further research in this area.
The subjective
methodology of the project launches
from the transcript of the
aforementioned meeting in Podroom that
serves as a loose scenario structuring
the very presentation of the research
material, the contents of which are
original written and visual documents,
as well as a collection of more or less
arbitrarily connected and disconnected
associations, quotes and fragmentary
narratives. The title Removed from
the Crowd (taken from the title of a
piece by Mladen Stilinović) thus becomes
a signifier not only of the
differentiation of the “associated
individuals” as against the
ideologically propagated collectivity
but also a signifier of the actual
methodology. ‘Bits and pieces’ function
as a building material for the process
of sampling and mixing of images and
quotes from catalogues, artist books,
our conversations with artists and
curators, as well as inserts from
sources that don’t explicitly interfere
with the artistic context, that are all
here overtly, maybe even aggressively,
‘removed’ from their original context to
form a number of possible narratives,
that reveal art history itself as a
performance, relying on subjective
processes of selection and
interpretation.
Accordingly, the
intention of the project is not the
creation of a “convincing” and
scientifically well-grounded historical
or art-historical narrative - it aims
rather to indicate an associative
cartography functioning as memory
script, a map that selects the facts
about processes, methodologies and
situations we consider to be relevant
for us today as well as from a series of
speculations derived from the
enlargement of details, deliberate
omissions, arbitrary connections, all in
the aid of articulating a different
viewpoint, a temporary and unstable
truth through a different
“performance” of the writing of the
history of contemporary art. Such a
‘subjective methodology’ stems from
considerations evolving around the
blurred borders of artistic, theoretical
and curatorial work, while the output of
this processes manifests itself as an
open and exploratory endeavour to search
for new modes of bypassing the pressures
of naming, the new and constant
‘visibility’. The answer to the
question why we would today, embark on
yet another venture into investigation
of art history/memory, lies not so much
in the fact that we, as curators and art
historians, would wish to contribute new
knowledge or innovative discourse when
addressing the art of the 60s and 70s.
The answer is again of a highly
subjective nature: the ‘removed bits and
pieces’ represent a set of important
references to our own everyday
professional practice both in the way of
how we perceive ‘working together’, the
efforts to withstand the overall
precariousness of conditions of
production, the pressure of
hyper-production that it entails and
finally - how we perceive the potential
meanings our work might generate.
In this sense, both the concept of
dematerialisation of art - and one might
add, dematerialisation of curatorial
work, as well as the models of
collaboration, association and ways of
constituting the common, typical
of the 60s and 70s, become highly
relevant again.
Thematically, the
exhibition continues the project
SKC
in ŠKUC, which
was carried out by Škuc Gallery in
collaboration with Prelom collective in
year 2008.
The
programme of Škuc Gallery is supported
by Ministry of
Culture of the Republic of Slovenia
and
Cultural Department of the City of
Ljubljana.
|